Argentinean vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability
COMPARE
Argentinean
Jordanian
Ambulatory Disability
Ambulatory Disability Comparison
Argentineans
Jordanians
5.5%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.6%
AMBULATORY DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
52nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Argentinean vs Jordanian Ambulatory Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 297,088,064 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.221 and weighted average of 5.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,412,494 people shows a mild negative correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of population with ambulatory disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.384 and weighted average of 5.6%, a difference of 1.6%.
Ambulatory Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Argentinean | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 12.8% | 8.6% |
| Range | 11.5% | 6.8% |
| Mean | 5.1% | 5.0% |
| Median | 5.1% | 5.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.8% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.1% | 2.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.1% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Argentineans and Jordanians by Ambulatory Disability
In terms of ambulatory disability, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Mongolian (5.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Venezuelan (5.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Eritrea (5.5%, a difference of 0.50%), Paraguayan (5.5%, a difference of 0.54%), and Turkish (5.5%, a difference of 0.59%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Immigrants from Egypt (5.6%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Eastern Africa (5.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Taiwanese (5.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (5.6%, a difference of 0.12%), and Luxembourger (5.6%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Ambulatory Disability |
| Turks | 100.0 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Cypriots | 100.0 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Venezuelans | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Mongolians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Argentineans | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Paraguayans | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Indonesia | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 5.5% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Egyptians | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Japan | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Bulgarians | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Luxembourgers | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Taiwanese | 99.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Jordanians | 99.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Egypt | 99.8 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.8 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Inupiat | 99.8 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 5.6% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 5.6% |