Peruvian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty
COMPARE
Peruvian
Chickasaw
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Peruvians
Chickasaw
12.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
85.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
270th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Peruvian vs Chickasaw Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 362,941,638 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Peruvians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.185 and weighted average of 12.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,658,289 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.004 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 23.2%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Peruvian | Chickasaw |
| Minimum | 0.21% | 1.9% |
| Maximum | 40.9% | 38.6% |
| Range | 40.7% | 36.7% |
| Mean | 14.1% | 18.1% |
| Median | 12.5% | 17.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 14.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 20.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 6.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 5.9% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Peruvians by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Peruvians are French (12.9%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (12.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Switzerland (12.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Western Europe (12.8%, a difference of 0.30%), and Immigrants from France (12.9%, a difference of 0.31%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 87.9 /100 | #129 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 87.1 /100 | #130 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 87.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 86.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 86.6 /100 | #133 | Excellent 12.8% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 85.8 /100 | #134 | Excellent 12.9% |
| French | 85.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Peruvians | 85.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Chileans | 84.7 /100 | #137 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Immigrants | France | 83.6 /100 | #138 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Basques | 83.1 /100 | #139 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Pakistanis | 83.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 12.9% |
| Icelanders | 81.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Brazilians | 80.5 /100 | #142 | Excellent 13.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 80.4 /100 | #143 | Excellent 13.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Iroquois (15.8%, a difference of 0.26%), Immigrants from St. Vincent and the Grenadines (15.9%, a difference of 0.28%), Belizean (15.9%, a difference of 0.50%), Haitian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%), and Barbadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.51%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 15.6% |
| Immigrants | Liberia | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Immigrants | El Salvador | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 15.7% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Immigrants | Nicaragua | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Iroquois | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 15.8% |
| Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | St. Vincent and the Grenadines | 0.0 /100 | #271 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Belizeans | 0.0 /100 | #272 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Haitians | 0.0 /100 | #273 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Barbadians | 0.0 /100 | #274 | Tragic 15.9% |
| Immigrants | Barbados | 0.0 /100 | #275 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Central Americans | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 16.0% |
| Bangladeshis | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 16.0% |