White/Caucasian vs Swedish No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
Swedish
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Swedes
7.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
15th/ 347
METRIC RANK
6.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
8th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Swedish No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 564,577,305 people shows a very strong negative correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.830 and weighted average of 7.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 534,930,678 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swedes and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 6.8%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Swedish |
| Minimum | 4.8% | 1.8% |
| Maximum | 32.3% | 30.8% |
| Range | 27.4% | 28.9% |
| Mean | 10.9% | 6.2% |
| Median | 8.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.2% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 6.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.4% | 2.6% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.1% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Swedes by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Mexican (7.0%, a difference of 0.13%), Scandinavian (7.0%, a difference of 0.30%), Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (7.0%, a difference of 0.80%), European (7.1%, a difference of 1.1%), and Welsh (7.2%, a difference of 1.7%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Swedes are Scotch-Irish (6.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Scottish (6.8%, a difference of 0.47%), Dutch (6.8%, a difference of 0.72%), Czech (6.9%, a difference of 1.3%), and German (6.7%, a difference of 1.8%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 5.4% |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 6.4% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 6.5% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Yakama | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 6.6% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 6.7% |
| Scottish | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Scotch-Irish | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 6.8% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 6.9% |
| Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Mexicans | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 7.0% |
| Europeans | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 7.1% |
| Welsh | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 7.2% |
| Arapaho | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Ottawa | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 7.4% |
| Nepalese | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 7.4% |