Swiss vs Immigrants from Mexico No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Swiss
 Immigrants from Mexico
 No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from Mexico
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
58th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from Mexico No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 510,868,339 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Mexico and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 8.1%, a difference of 3.6%.
 
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from Mexico | 
| Minimum | 2.8% | 0.44% | 
| Maximum | 65.0% | 29.4% | 
| Range | 62.2% | 29.0% | 
| Mean | 14.0% | 8.1% | 
| Median | 9.4% | 7.2% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 6.3% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 8.5% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 2.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 4.1% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 4.1% | 
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from Mexico by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Mexico are Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.35%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.42%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 0.78%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household | 
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41  | Exceptional 7.8%  | 
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47  | Exceptional 7.9%  | 
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53  | Exceptional 8.0%  | 
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58  | Exceptional 8.1%  | 
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59  | Exceptional 8.2%  | 
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60  | Exceptional 8.2%  |