Swiss vs Immigrants from India No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Swiss
Immigrants from India
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Swiss
Immigrants from India
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
42nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
59th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Swiss vs Immigrants from India No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 462,788,069 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.537 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 432,669,586 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from India and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.131 and weighted average of 8.2%, a difference of 4.0%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Swiss | Immigrants from India |
Minimum | 2.8% | 0.34% |
Maximum | 65.0% | 23.1% |
Range | 62.2% | 22.8% |
Mean | 14.0% | 6.4% |
Median | 9.4% | 5.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.5% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 15.2% | 7.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.7% | 3.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 13.3% | 4.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 13.1% | 4.1% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss and Immigrants from India by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.28%), Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.44%), and Nonimmigrants (7.9%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from India are Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Mexico (8.1%, a difference of 0.35%), Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.46%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.74%), and Celtic (8.1%, a difference of 1.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |