Slavic vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Slavic
Portuguese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Slavs
Portuguese
9.0%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
98.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
98th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Slavic vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 270,391,797 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Slavs and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.108 and weighted average of 9.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,384,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 4.4%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Slavic | Portuguese |
Minimum | 0.74% | 1.1% |
Maximum | 15.4% | 21.5% |
Range | 14.7% | 20.4% |
Mean | 5.8% | 8.1% |
Median | 5.8% | 7.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.8% | 9.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.8% | 4.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.3% | 4.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.3% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Slavs and Portuguese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Slavs are Immigrants from Central America (8.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Bolivia (8.9%, a difference of 0.97%), Potawatomi (8.8%, a difference of 1.3%), Austrian (8.8%, a difference of 1.4%), and Immigrants from North America (8.7%, a difference of 2.4%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), and Italian (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Immigrants | North America | 99.1 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 8.7% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Potawatomi | 98.8 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 8.8% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 98.7 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Immigrants | Central America | 98.5 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 8.9% |
Slavs | 98.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 9.0% |