Iranian vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Iranian
Portuguese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Iranians
Portuguese
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
77th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Iranian vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 316,234,077 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Iranians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.025 and weighted average of 8.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,384,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.18%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Iranian | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 1.2% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 24.0% | 21.5% |
| Range | 22.8% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 8.1% |
| Median | 6.0% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.7% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.6% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.9% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.5% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Iranians and Portuguese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Iranians are Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.33%), and Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.38%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |