Lebanese vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Lebanese
Portuguese
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Lebanese
Portuguese
8.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.6%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
79th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Lebanese vs Portuguese No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 400,489,839 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Lebanese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.214 and weighted average of 8.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 448,384,012 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Portuguese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.163 and weighted average of 8.6%, a difference of 0.98%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Lebanese | Portuguese |
| Minimum | 2.7% | 1.1% |
| Maximum | 30.0% | 21.5% |
| Range | 27.3% | 20.4% |
| Mean | 7.7% | 8.1% |
| Median | 6.5% | 7.3% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.4% | 4.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.9% | 9.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.5% | 4.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.4% | 4.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.3% | 4.7% |
Demographics Similar to Lebanese and Portuguese by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Lebanese are Immigrants from Jordan (8.7%, a difference of 0.060%), Bangladeshi (8.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Italian (8.6%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from England (8.7%, a difference of 0.33%), and Osage (8.7%, a difference of 0.45%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Portuguese are Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.060%), Bolivian (8.6%, a difference of 0.15%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Tsimshian (8.6%, a difference of 0.20%), and Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.26%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Portuguese | 99.5 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Bolivians | 99.4 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Tsimshian | 99.4 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 99.4 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Italians | 99.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 99.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Lebanese | 99.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bangladeshis | 99.3 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | England | 99.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Osage | 99.2 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 99.2 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Bhutanese | 99.2 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Germany | 99.1 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 8.7% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 99.1 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 8.7% |