Salvadoran vs Immigrants from Eastern Africa 1 or more Vehicles in Household

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 398,652,231 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.053 and weighted average of 90.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 354,905,659 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Eastern Africa and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.172 and weighted average of 90.1%, a difference of 0.19%.

1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary

Measurement	Salvadoran	Immigrants from Eastern Africa
Minimum	74.1%	75.5%
Maximum	100.0%	100.0%
Range	25.9%	24.5%
Mean	90.3%	90.6%
Median	91.1%	91.0%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	87.9%	87.9%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	93.3%	93.4%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.4%	5.5%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	4.9%	5.0%
Standard Deviation (Population)	4.9%	5.0%

Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Immigrants from Eastern Africa by 1 or more Vehicles in Household

In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Indonesia (90.0%, a difference of 0.0%), South African (90.0%, a difference of 0.020%), Spanish American Indian (89.9%, a difference of 0.030%), Brazilian (90.0%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Congo (90.0%, a difference of 0.050%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Eastern Africa are Immigrants from Nicaragua (90.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Chilean (90.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Bahamian (90.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Micronesia (90.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (90.1%, a difference of 0.060%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	1 or more Vehicles in Household
Immigrants \| Zimbabwe	81.5 /100 \| #144	Excellent 90.2%
Sioux	81.3 /100 \| #145	Excellent 90.2%
Bahamians	80.5 /100 \| #146	Excellent 90.2%
Chileans	79.8 /100 \| #147	Good 90.2%
Immigrants \| Eastern Africa	78.2 /100 \| #148	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Nicaragua	76.7 /100 \| #149	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Micronesia	75.9 /100 \| #150	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Bosnia and Herzegovina	75.4 /100 \| #151	Good 90.1%
Tlingit-Haida	74.3 /100 \| #152	Good 90.1%
New Zealanders	73.8 /100 \| #153	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Uganda	73.8 /100 \| #154	Good 90.1%
Immigrants \| Immigrants	73.6 /100 \| #155	Good 90.1%
Australians	72.4 /100 \| #156	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Congo	71.2 /100 \| #157	Good 90.0%
Brazilians	71.0 /100 \| #158	Good 90.0%
South Africans	69.7 /100 \| #159	Good 90.0%
Immigrants \| Indonesia	68.8 /100 \| #160	Good 90.0%
Salvadorans	68.7 /100 \| #161	Good 90.0%
Spanish American Indians	67.0 /100 \| #162	Good 89.9%
Immigrants \| Austria	65.5 /100 \| #163	Good 89.9%
Comanche	63.4 /100 \| #164	Good 89.9%