Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from South Africa
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Sweden
Immigrants from South Africa
10.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
22.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
198th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
85.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
136th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Sweden vs Immigrants from South Africa No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 164,538,272 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Sweden and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.234 and weighted average of 10.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 232,945,081 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from South Africa and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.620 and weighted average of 9.8%, a difference of 10.6%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Sweden | Immigrants from South Africa |
Minimum | 0.75% | 1.5% |
Maximum | 15.3% | 100.0% |
Range | 14.5% | 98.5% |
Mean | 5.8% | 9.7% |
Median | 4.3% | 5.7% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.0% | 4.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.3% | 7.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.3% | 3.3% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 18.2% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.9% | 17.9% |
Similar Demographics by No Vehicles in Household
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Sweden by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Sweden are Shoshone (10.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Central American (10.8%, a difference of 0.25%), Immigrants from Asia (10.9%, a difference of 0.31%), Immigrants from Brazil (10.8%, a difference of 0.59%), and Cambodian (10.9%, a difference of 0.64%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 33.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 10.7% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 32.1 /100 | #192 | Fair 10.7% |
Ukrainians | 28.0 /100 | #193 | Fair 10.7% |
Pueblo | 27.0 /100 | #194 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 26.3 /100 | #195 | Fair 10.8% |
Central Americans | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 10.8% |
Shoshone | 24.1 /100 | #197 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 10.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 21.3 /100 | #199 | Fair 10.9% |
Cambodians | 19.6 /100 | #200 | Poor 10.9% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 19.1 /100 | #201 | Poor 10.9% |
Romanians | 17.9 /100 | #202 | Poor 10.9% |
Iroquois | 17.6 /100 | #203 | Poor 10.9% |
Guatemalans | 16.1 /100 | #204 | Poor 11.0% |
Immigrants | Chile | 15.9 /100 | #205 | Poor 11.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from South Africa by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from South Africa are Latvian (9.8%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Moldova (9.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Estonian (9.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Marshallese (9.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Lithuania (9.8%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |
Latvians | 85.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 85.0 /100 | #136 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 84.6 /100 | #137 | Excellent 9.8% |
Estonians | 84.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 9.8% |
Marshallese | 84.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 84.0 /100 | #140 | Excellent 9.8% |
Sudanese | 83.1 /100 | #141 | Excellent 9.8% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 82.6 /100 | #142 | Excellent 9.9% |
Chileans | 81.2 /100 | #143 | Excellent 9.9% |