Chinese vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chinese
Cuban
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chinese
Cubans
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
74th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Cuban No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,763,306 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 447,809,570 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.165 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.5%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Cuban |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 0.80% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 20.7% |
| Range | 18.5% | 19.9% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 7.7% |
| Median | 5.2% | 6.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 5.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 8.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 3.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 4.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 4.2% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Cubans by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (8.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Thai (8.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Croatian (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Jordanian (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.46%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.55%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.67%), and Polish (8.4%, a difference of 0.86%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |