Immigrants from Oceania vs Navajo No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Oceania
Navajo
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Oceania
Navajo
9.7%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
87.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
133rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
94.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
115th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Oceania vs Navajo No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 304,786,769 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Oceania and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.150 and weighted average of 9.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 224,409,454 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Navajo and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.515 and weighted average of 9.4%, a difference of 3.3%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Oceania | Navajo |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.12% |
Maximum | 17.7% | 27.9% |
Range | 16.7% | 27.8% |
Mean | 9.3% | 9.3% |
Median | 9.4% | 7.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 4.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.9% | 12.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.7% | 7.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 3.7% | 6.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 3.6% | 6.3% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Oceania and Navajo by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Oceania are Syrian (9.7%, a difference of 0.020%), Kenyan (9.7%, a difference of 0.30%), Immigrants from the Azores (9.7%, a difference of 0.37%), Burmese (9.7%, a difference of 0.58%), and Nicaraguan (9.7%, a difference of 0.83%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Navajo are Serbian (9.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Japanese (9.4%, a difference of 0.070%), Chippewa (9.4%, a difference of 0.24%), Greek (9.5%, a difference of 0.79%), and Fijian (9.5%, a difference of 0.90%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
Serbians | 94.3 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Navajo | 94.2 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Japanese | 94.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Chippewa | 93.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Greeks | 92.9 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Fijians | 92.7 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 92.6 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Puget Sound Salish | 92.4 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Costa Ricans | 92.3 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 9.5% |
Blackfeet | 91.4 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Korea | 90.9 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 90.6 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Icelanders | 90.2 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 9.6% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 89.7 /100 | #127 | Excellent 9.6% |
Immigrants | Syria | 89.5 /100 | #128 | Excellent 9.6% |
Nicaraguans | 89.5 /100 | #129 | Excellent 9.7% |
Burmese | 88.8 /100 | #130 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Azores | 88.2 /100 | #131 | Excellent 9.7% |
Kenyans | 88.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 9.7% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 87.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 9.7% |
Syrians | 87.1 /100 | #134 | Excellent 9.7% |