Immigrants from Latin America vs Filipino No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Immigrants from Latin America
Filipino
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Immigrants from Latin America
Filipinos
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
53.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
170th/ 347
METRIC RANK
10.4%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
50.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
173rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Latin America vs Filipino No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 543,017,545 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Latin America and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.105 and weighted average of 10.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 253,938,776 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Filipinos and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.507 and weighted average of 10.4%, a difference of 0.42%.

No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Latin America | Filipino |
Minimum | 0.80% | 0.54% |
Maximum | 34.4% | 25.0% |
Range | 33.6% | 24.5% |
Mean | 11.2% | 6.8% |
Median | 9.6% | 5.6% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.2% | 2.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.2% | 6.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.9% | 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Latin America and Filipinos by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Latin America are Hmong (10.4%, a difference of 0.060%), Lumbee (10.3%, a difference of 0.21%), Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.43%), and Indonesian (10.3%, a difference of 0.48%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Filipinos are Immigrants from Sudan (10.4%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), French American Indian (10.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from El Salvador (10.4%, a difference of 0.14%), and Brazilian (10.4%, a difference of 0.22%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
New Zealanders | 65.1 /100 | #161 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Austria | 64.4 /100 | #162 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 63.7 /100 | #163 | Good 10.2% |
South Africans | 61.1 /100 | #164 | Good 10.2% |
Comanche | 60.8 /100 | #165 | Good 10.2% |
Immigrants | Costa Rica | 60.5 /100 | #166 | Good 10.3% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 58.8 /100 | #167 | Average 10.3% |
Indonesians | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 10.3% |
Lumbee | 54.7 /100 | #169 | Average 10.3% |
Immigrants | Latin America | 53.2 /100 | #170 | Average 10.4% |
Hmong | 52.7 /100 | #171 | Average 10.4% |
Brazilians | 51.7 /100 | #172 | Average 10.4% |
Filipinos | 50.1 /100 | #173 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 50.0 /100 | #174 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 49.1 /100 | #175 | Average 10.4% |
French American Indians | 49.1 /100 | #176 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | El Salvador | 49.1 /100 | #177 | Average 10.4% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 48.0 /100 | #178 | Average 10.4% |
Ethiopians | 45.8 /100 | #179 | Average 10.5% |
Arabs | 45.3 /100 | #180 | Average 10.5% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 44.1 /100 | #181 | Average 10.5% |