Guatemalan vs Shoshone 1 or more Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Guatemalan
Shoshone
1 or more Vehicles in Household
1 or more Vehicles in Household Comparison
Guatemalans
Shoshone
89.2%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
17.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
205th/ 347
METRIC RANK
89.5%
1 OR MORE VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
37.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
190th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Guatemalan vs Shoshone 1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 409,296,484 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Guatemalans and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.319 and weighted average of 89.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 66,616,007 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Shoshone and percentage of households with 1 or more vehicles available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.139 and weighted average of 89.5%, a difference of 0.40%.
1 or more Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Guatemalan | Shoshone |
| Minimum | 69.6% | 84.7% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 30.4% | 15.3% |
| Mean | 90.4% | 95.3% |
| Median | 90.4% | 95.2% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 86.5% | 93.3% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 95.7% | 98.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.3% | 5.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to Guatemalans and Shoshone by 1 or more Vehicles in Household
In terms of 1 or more vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Guatemalans are Romanian (89.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (89.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Iroquois (89.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Apache (89.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Western Europe (89.2%, a difference of 0.070%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Shoshone are Carpatho Rusyn (89.5%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Poland (89.5%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (89.5%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from North Macedonia (89.5%, a difference of 0.020%), and South American (89.5%, a difference of 0.030%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | 1 or more Vehicles in Household |
| South Americans | 39.6 /100 | #187 | Fair 89.5% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 38.9 /100 | #188 | Fair 89.5% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 37.8 /100 | #189 | Fair 89.5% |
| Shoshone | 37.5 /100 | #190 | Fair 89.5% |
| Immigrants | Poland | 37.1 /100 | #191 | Fair 89.5% |
| Immigrants | North Macedonia | 36.5 /100 | #192 | Fair 89.5% |
| Immigrants | Northern Europe | 35.5 /100 | #193 | Fair 89.5% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 33.2 /100 | #194 | Fair 89.4% |
| Immigrants | Armenia | 31.8 /100 | #195 | Fair 89.4% |
| Crow | 24.3 /100 | #196 | Fair 89.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 23.6 /100 | #197 | Fair 89.3% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 22.9 /100 | #198 | Fair 89.3% |
| Immigrants | Asia | 22.8 /100 | #199 | Fair 89.3% |
| Central Americans | 21.4 /100 | #200 | Fair 89.2% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 20.5 /100 | #201 | Fair 89.2% |
| Iroquois | 19.8 /100 | #202 | Poor 89.2% |
| Cambodians | 18.9 /100 | #203 | Poor 89.2% |
| Romanians | 18.2 /100 | #204 | Poor 89.2% |
| Guatemalans | 17.8 /100 | #205 | Poor 89.2% |
| Apache | 16.2 /100 | #206 | Poor 89.1% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 14.8 /100 | #207 | Poor 89.1% |