Chinese vs Jordanian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Chinese
Jordanian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Chinese
Jordanians
8.2%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
62nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
8.5%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
75th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Jordanian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,763,306 people shows a weak negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.214 and weighted average of 8.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 166,331,482 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Jordanians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.030 and weighted average of 8.5%, a difference of 3.7%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Chinese | Jordanian |
| Minimum | 1.3% | 1.4% |
| Maximum | 19.8% | 13.9% |
| Range | 18.5% | 12.5% |
| Mean | 6.6% | 6.1% |
| Median | 5.2% | 5.8% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 7.2% | 7.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 3.5% | 4.2% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.6% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.6% | 3.0% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Jordanians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Slovak (8.3%, a difference of 0.38%), Thai (8.2%, a difference of 0.46%), Croatian (8.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Laos (8.2%, a difference of 0.62%), and Immigrants from India (8.2%, a difference of 0.69%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Jordanians are Cuban (8.5%, a difference of 0.22%), Immigrants from Philippines (8.5%, a difference of 0.24%), Iranian (8.6%, a difference of 0.33%), Immigrants from South Central Asia (8.6%, a difference of 0.45%), and Polish (8.4%, a difference of 1.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | India | 99.8 /100 | #59 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Immigrants | Laos | 99.8 /100 | #60 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Thais | 99.8 /100 | #61 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Chinese | 99.8 /100 | #62 | Exceptional 8.2% |
| Slovaks | 99.8 /100 | #63 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Croatians | 99.8 /100 | #64 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Canadians | 99.7 /100 | #65 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Palestinians | 99.7 /100 | #66 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Scotland | 99.7 /100 | #67 | Exceptional 8.3% |
| Immigrants | Iran | 99.7 /100 | #68 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Spaniards | 99.7 /100 | #69 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cajuns | 99.6 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Immigrants | Lebanon | 99.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Poles | 99.6 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 8.4% |
| Cubans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Jordanians | 99.5 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Immigrants | Philippines | 99.5 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 8.5% |
| Iranians | 99.5 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 8.6% |
| Immigrants | South Central Asia | 99.5 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 8.6% |