Chinese vs Cuban Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
COMPARE
Chinese
Cuban
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Comparison
Chinese
Cubans
9.4%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
18th/ 347
METRIC RANK
9.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 20 TO 24 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
12th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Chinese vs Cuban Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 64,258,935 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Chinese and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.119 and weighted average of 9.4%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 433,228,061 people shows a substantial negative correlation between the proportion of Cubans and unemployment rate among population between the ages 20 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.534 and weighted average of 9.2%, a difference of 1.6%.

Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Chinese | Cuban |
Minimum | 1.8% | 0.20% |
Maximum | 22.3% | 20.4% |
Range | 20.5% | 20.2% |
Mean | 9.6% | 9.1% |
Median | 8.5% | 9.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.7% | 6.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 11.8% | 11.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 4.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.4% | 4.3% |
Demographics Similar to Chinese and Cubans by Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 20 to 24 years, the demographic groups most similar to Chinese are Hmong (9.4%, a difference of 0.12%), Osage (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Bosnia and Herzegovina (9.4%, a difference of 0.13%), Tongan (9.4%, a difference of 0.40%), and Immigrants from Nepal (9.4%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cubans are Immigrants from Congo (9.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Zimbabwean (9.2%, a difference of 0.10%), Slovene (9.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Sudan (9.3%, a difference of 0.49%), and Sudanese (9.2%, a difference of 0.55%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 20 to 24 years |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 9.0% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Somalis | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 9.1% |
Immigrants | Somalia | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Zimbabweans | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Cubans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 9.2% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 9.3% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Osage | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Tongans | 100.0 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 100.0 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Taiwanese | 100.0 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 9.4% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 100.0 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 9.5% |