Celtic vs French Canadian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Celtic
French Canadian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Celtics
French Canadians
8.1%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
55th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Celtic vs French Canadian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 168,703,210 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Celtics and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.154 and weighted average of 8.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,834,942 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 2.9%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Celtic | French Canadian |
| Minimum | 0.51% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 21.5% | 21.0% |
| Range | 21.0% | 19.4% |
| Mean | 7.1% | 8.2% |
| Median | 6.6% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.1% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 9.3% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.3% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Celtics and French Canadians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Celtics are Immigrants from Venezuela (8.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (8.1%, a difference of 0.39%), Hawaiian (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), Slovene (8.0%, a difference of 0.40%), and Venezuelan (8.1%, a difference of 0.68%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Celtics | 99.9 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 99.9 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Venezuelans | 99.8 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 8.1% |
| Immigrants | Mexico | 99.8 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 8.1% |