Nonimmigrants vs French Canadian No Vehicles in Household
COMPARE
Nonimmigrants
French Canadian
No Vehicles in Household
No Vehicles in Household Comparison
Nonimmigrants
French Canadians
7.9%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
7.8%
NO VEHICLES IN HOUSEHOLD
99.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
41st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Nonimmigrants vs French Canadian No Vehicles in Household Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 566,903,421 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Nonimmigrants and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.485 and weighted average of 7.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 499,834,942 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of French Canadians and percentage of households with no vehicle available in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.264 and weighted average of 7.8%, a difference of 0.74%.
No Vehicles in Household Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Nonimmigrants | French Canadian |
| Minimum | 4.3% | 1.6% |
| Maximum | 47.4% | 21.0% |
| Range | 43.1% | 19.4% |
| Mean | 12.3% | 8.2% |
| Median | 9.8% | 7.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 7.1% | 5.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 8.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.5% | 3.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.0% | 4.0% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.0% | 3.9% |
Demographics Similar to Nonimmigrants and French Canadians by No Vehicles in Household
In terms of no vehicles in household, the demographic groups most similar to Nonimmigrants are Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Spanish (7.9%, a difference of 0.26%), Northern European (7.9%, a difference of 0.38%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.53%), and Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.61%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to French Canadians are Czechoslovakian (7.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Swiss (7.9%, a difference of 0.14%), Chickasaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.21%), Immigrants from Fiji (7.8%, a difference of 0.24%), and Choctaw (7.9%, a difference of 0.57%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | No Vehicles in Household |
| Immigrants | Taiwan | 100.0 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Immigrants | Vietnam | 100.0 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Cherokee | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Iraqis | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 7.7% |
| Basques | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Creek | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Immigrants | Fiji | 99.9 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Czechoslovakians | 99.9 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| French Canadians | 99.9 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 7.8% |
| Swiss | 99.9 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Chickasaw | 99.9 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Choctaw | 99.9 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 99.9 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Spanish | 99.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Northern Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 7.9% |
| Afghans | 99.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 99.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Belgians | 99.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Koreans | 99.9 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Hawaiians | 99.9 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 8.0% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 8.0% |