White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Hearing Disability
COMPARE
White/Caucasian
 Scotch-Irish
 Hearing Disability
Hearing Disability Comparison
Whites/Caucasians
Scotch-Irish
3.7%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
290th/ 347
METRIC RANK
3.8%
HEARING DISABILITY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
309th/ 347
METRIC RANK
White/Caucasian vs Scotch-Irish Hearing Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 582,250,050 people shows a very strong positive correlation between the proportion of Whites/Caucasians and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.831 and weighted average of 3.7%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 548,308,255 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and percentage of population with hearing disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.385 and weighted average of 3.8%, a difference of 4.0%.
 
Hearing Disability Correlation Summary
| Measurement | White/Caucasian | Scotch-Irish | 
| Minimum | 2.1% | 1.2% | 
| Maximum | 5.7% | 66.7% | 
| Range | 3.6% | 65.5% | 
| Mean | 3.2% | 9.5% | 
| Median | 3.0% | 6.1% | 
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.7% | 4.9% | 
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 3.7% | 9.1% | 
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.0% | 4.2% | 
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 0.77% | 10.8% | 
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 0.77% | 10.7% | 
Demographics Similar to Whites/Caucasians and Scotch-Irish by Hearing Disability
In terms of hearing disability, the demographic groups most similar to Whites/Caucasians are Finnish (3.7%, a difference of 0.010%), Native Hawaiian (3.7%, a difference of 0.080%), Chinese (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), Norwegian (3.7%, a difference of 0.13%), and Iroquois (3.7%, a difference of 0.37%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ottawa (3.8%, a difference of 0.080%), French Canadian (3.8%, a difference of 0.52%), Marshallese (3.8%, a difference of 0.64%), English (3.8%, a difference of 1.5%), and French (3.8%, a difference of 2.1%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Hearing Disability | 
| Chinese | 0.0 /100 | #289  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Whites/Caucasians | 0.0 /100 | #290  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Finns | 0.0 /100 | #291  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Native Hawaiians | 0.0 /100 | #292  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Norwegians | 0.0 /100 | #293  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Iroquois | 0.0 /100 | #294  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Welsh | 0.0 /100 | #295  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Pima | 0.0 /100 | #296  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #297  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Celtics | 0.0 /100 | #298  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Germans | 0.0 /100 | #299  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Scottish | 0.0 /100 | #300  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #301  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Dutch | 0.0 /100 | #302  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #303  | Tragic 3.7%  | 
| French | 0.0 /100 | #304  | Tragic 3.8%  | 
| English | 0.0 /100 | #305  | Tragic 3.8%  | 
| Marshallese | 0.0 /100 | #306  | Tragic 3.8%  | 
| French Canadians | 0.0 /100 | #307  | Tragic 3.8%  | 
| Ottawa | 0.0 /100 | #308  | Tragic 3.8%  | 
| Scotch-Irish | 0.0 /100 | #309  | Tragic 3.8%  |