Scandinavian vs Norwegian Unemployment
COMPARE
Scandinavian
Norwegian
Unemployment
Unemployment Comparison
Scandinavians
Norwegians
4.5%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
9th/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.2%
UNEMPLOYMENT
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
1st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scandinavian vs Norwegian Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 471,134,185 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Scandinavians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.417 and weighted average of 4.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 530,614,839 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and unemployment in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.043 and weighted average of 4.2%, a difference of 8.4%.
Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scandinavian | Norwegian |
| Minimum | 2.0% | 0.30% |
| Maximum | 41.7% | 9.2% |
| Range | 39.7% | 8.9% |
| Mean | 7.4% | 3.6% |
| Median | 5.2% | 3.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 3.7% | 2.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.8% | 4.3% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 5.1% | 1.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.9% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.8% | 1.5% |
Demographics Similar to Scandinavians and Norwegians by Unemployment
In terms of unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Scandinavians are Swiss (4.5%, a difference of 0.39%), Dutch (4.6%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from India (4.5%, a difference of 0.86%), English (4.6%, a difference of 1.2%), and Pennsylvania German (4.6%, a difference of 1.3%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Luxembourger (4.3%, a difference of 3.4%), Czech (4.3%, a difference of 3.5%), Danish (4.3%, a difference of 3.6%), Swedish (4.4%, a difference of 6.0%), and German (4.5%, a difference of 6.9%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment |
| Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 4.2% |
| Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Czechs | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Danes | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.3% |
| Swedes | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.4% |
| Germans | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Immigrants | India | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Swiss | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Scandinavians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.5% |
| Dutch | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| English | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Belgians | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Europeans | 99.9 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.6% |
| Chinese | 99.9 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Slovenes | 99.9 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.9 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Scottish | 99.9 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.7% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 99.9 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.7% |