Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Southern Europe
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from Zimbabwe
Immigrants from Southern Europe
4.9%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
99.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.4%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
17.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
195th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Zimbabwe vs Immigrants from Southern Europe Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,685,167 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Zimbabwe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.094 and weighted average of 4.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 401,185,353 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Southern Europe and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.370 and weighted average of 5.4%, a difference of 9.6%.
Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Zimbabwe | Immigrants from Southern Europe |
Minimum | 0.60% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 9.1% | 10.8% |
Range | 8.5% | 7.9% |
Mean | 4.8% | 6.0% |
Median | 4.8% | 5.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.0% | 5.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 5.9% | 6.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.9% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.7% | 1.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.7% | 1.7% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Zimbabwe are Bhutanese (4.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Korea (4.9%, a difference of 0.15%), Austrian (4.9%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Scotland (4.9%, a difference of 0.18%), and Polish (4.9%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 99.4 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Burmese | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Northern Europeans | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Chinese | 99.3 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.2 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Japan | 99.2 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.1 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.0 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Bhutanese | 98.9 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Austrians | 98.9 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 98.9 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Poles | 98.9 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Croatians | 98.9 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 4.9% |
Slovenes | 98.8 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Irish | 98.8 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Southern Europe are Albanian (5.4%, a difference of 0.040%), Alsatian (5.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Spanish (5.4%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Thailand (5.4%, a difference of 0.32%), and Immigrants from Greece (5.4%, a difference of 0.34%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Arabs | 30.2 /100 | #188 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South America | 29.4 /100 | #189 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 28.8 /100 | #190 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 28.2 /100 | #191 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 26.0 /100 | #192 | Fair 5.4% |
Immigrants | Israel | 25.2 /100 | #193 | Fair 5.4% |
Spanish | 19.7 /100 | #194 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 17.7 /100 | #195 | Poor 5.4% |
Albanians | 17.3 /100 | #196 | Poor 5.4% |
Alsatians | 16.7 /100 | #197 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 14.7 /100 | #198 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Greece | 14.5 /100 | #199 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Zaire | 13.7 /100 | #200 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Philippines | 13.5 /100 | #201 | Poor 5.4% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 13.1 /100 | #202 | Poor 5.4% |