Immigrants from Hong Kong vs Carpatho Rusyn Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 247,463,754 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Hong Kong and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.235 and weighted average of 6.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 57,767,148 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Carpatho Rusyns and unemployment rate among population between the ages 25 and 29 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.379 and weighted average of 6.3%, a difference of 0.35%.

Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Hong Kong	Carpatho Rusyn
Minimum	1.3%	1.6%
Maximum	21.1%	23.6%
Range	19.8%	22.0%
Mean	6.6%	7.7%
Median	6.1%	6.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	5.3%	5.3%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	7.3%	8.5%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	2.0%	3.2%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	2.8%	4.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	2.8%	4.7%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong and Carpatho Rusyns by Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years

In terms of unemployment among ages 25 to 29 years, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Hong Kong are Immigrants from Malaysia (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from France (6.3%, a difference of 0.060%), Scandinavian (6.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Palestinian (6.3%, a difference of 0.18%), and Indian (Asian) (6.3%, a difference of 0.23%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Carpatho Rusyns are Belgian (6.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Jordan (6.3%, a difference of 0.070%), Immigrants from Korea (6.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Icelander (6.3%, a difference of 0.16%), and Asian (6.3%, a difference of 0.25%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Unemployment Among Ages 25 to 29 years
Bhutanese	98.2 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 6.2%
Immigrants \| China	98.1 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 6.2%
Kenyans	98.0 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.9 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Lebanon	97.8 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 6.3%
Indians (Asian)	97.8 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Northern Africa	97.8 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 6.3%
Palestinians	97.7 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Hong Kong	97.5 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Malaysia	97.5 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| France	97.4 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 6.3%
Scandinavians	97.4 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 6.3%
Belgians	97.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 6.3%
Carpatho Rusyns	96.9 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Jordan	96.8 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Korea	96.7 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 6.3%
Icelanders	96.6 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 6.3%
Asians	96.4 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Switzerland	96.0 /100 \| #79	Exceptional 6.3%
Immigrants \| Romania	95.9 /100 \| #80	Exceptional 6.3%
Iranians	95.8 /100 \| #81	Exceptional 6.3%