Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment
COMPARE
Immigrants from England
Chickasaw
Male Unemployment
Male Unemployment Comparison
Immigrants from England
Chickasaw
5.1%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
90.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
MALE UNEMPLOYMENT
82.9/ 100
METRIC RATING
132nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from England vs Chickasaw Male Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,096,041 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from England and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.488 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 147,341,260 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.317 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 1.1%.

Male Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from England | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.0% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 25.9% | 13.2% |
Range | 24.9% | 12.3% |
Mean | 8.5% | 6.3% |
Median | 6.1% | 5.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.2% | 4.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 8.1% | 8.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.9% | 3.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.4% | 2.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.3% | 2.8% |
Similar Demographics by Male Unemployment
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from England by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from England are Immigrants from Eastern Asia (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Pakistan (5.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Nicaragua (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Ethiopian (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), and Immigrants from Moldova (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Jordan | 91.9 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 91.8 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 91.7 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 91.5 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 91.3 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Nicaragua | 91.2 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 90.9 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | England | 90.8 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 90.8 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 90.3 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Immigrants | Austria | 90.3 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 5.1% |
Romanians | 89.8 /100 | #114 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Asia | 89.6 /100 | #115 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Denmark | 89.4 /100 | #116 | Excellent 5.1% |
Estonians | 89.0 /100 | #117 | Excellent 5.1% |
Demographics Similar to Chickasaw by Male Unemployment
In terms of male unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Germany (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Malaysia (5.2%, a difference of 0.070%), Colombian (5.2%, a difference of 0.18%), Immigrants from Western Europe (5.2%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (5.2%, a difference of 0.24%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Male Unemployment |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 87.2 /100 | #125 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 86.8 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 86.3 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.2% |
Hungarians | 85.1 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Western Europe | 84.8 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 83.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Germany | 83.0 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.2% |
Chickasaw | 82.9 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.2% |
Colombians | 81.1 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.2% |
Pakistanis | 80.5 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.2% |
Immigrants | Saudi Arabia | 80.1 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.2% |
Lebanese | 79.9 /100 | #136 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 79.8 /100 | #137 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Croatia | 79.7 /100 | #138 | Good 5.2% |
Kenyans | 79.4 /100 | #139 | Good 5.2% |