Fijian vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
COMPARE
Fijian
Chickasaw
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Comparison
Fijians
Chickasaw
3.9%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
2nd/ 347
METRIC RANK
4.3%
UNEMPLOYMENT AMONG AGES 60 TO 64 YEARS
100.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
13th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Fijian vs Chickasaw Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 53,532,695 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Fijians and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.032 and weighted average of 3.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 139,083,828 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Chickasaw and unemployment rate among population between the ages 60 and 64 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.061 and weighted average of 4.3%, a difference of 11.3%.

Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years Correlation Summary
Measurement | Fijian | Chickasaw |
Minimum | 1.5% | 1.3% |
Maximum | 18.1% | 47.6% |
Range | 16.6% | 46.3% |
Mean | 4.9% | 10.5% |
Median | 3.8% | 6.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 2.3% | 3.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 4.6% | 15.0% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 2.3% | 11.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.5% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.3% | 11.4% |
Demographics Similar to Fijians and Chickasaw by Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years
In terms of unemployment among ages 60 to 64 years, the demographic groups most similar to Fijians are Chinese (4.0%, a difference of 2.9%), Hmong (4.0%, a difference of 3.3%), Immigrants from the Azores (4.0%, a difference of 3.3%), Marshallese (3.7%, a difference of 3.7%), and Immigrants from Congo (4.1%, a difference of 6.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Chickasaw are Immigrants from Cuba (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Norwegian (4.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Sudanese (4.3%, a difference of 0.55%), Danish (4.4%, a difference of 0.81%), and Immigrants from Afghanistan (4.4%, a difference of 0.97%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Unemployment Among Ages 60 to 64 years |
Marshallese | 100.0 /100 | #1 | Exceptional 3.7% |
Fijians | 100.0 /100 | #2 | Exceptional 3.9% |
Chinese | 100.0 /100 | #3 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Hmong | 100.0 /100 | #4 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Azores | 100.0 /100 | #5 | Exceptional 4.0% |
Immigrants | Congo | 100.0 /100 | #6 | Exceptional 4.1% |
Lumbee | 100.0 /100 | #7 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 100.0 /100 | #8 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Indonesians | 100.0 /100 | #9 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 100.0 /100 | #10 | Exceptional 4.2% |
Luxembourgers | 100.0 /100 | #11 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 100.0 /100 | #12 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Chickasaw | 100.0 /100 | #13 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Norwegians | 100.0 /100 | #14 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Sudanese | 100.0 /100 | #15 | Exceptional 4.3% |
Danes | 100.0 /100 | #16 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 100.0 /100 | #17 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Slovenes | 100.0 /100 | #18 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Tsimshian | 100.0 /100 | #19 | Exceptional 4.4% |
Afghans | 100.0 /100 | #20 | Exceptional 4.4% |