Ethiopian vs Argentinean Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Argentinean
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Ethiopians
Argentineans
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.2%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
79.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
147th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Argentinean Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,927,979 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 296,580,968 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Argentineans and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.053 and weighted average of 5.2%, a difference of 0.70%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Ethiopian | Argentinean |
| Minimum | 2.5% | 1.0% |
| Maximum | 19.3% | 16.2% |
| Range | 16.8% | 15.2% |
| Mean | 5.7% | 5.1% |
| Median | 5.1% | 4.7% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 3.9% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.4% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 2.4% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Argentineans by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Chilean (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (5.1%, a difference of 0.10%), and Immigrants from Hong Kong (5.1%, a difference of 0.12%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Argentineans are Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Argentina (5.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (5.1%, a difference of 0.14%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
| Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |
| Argentineans | 79.2 /100 | #147 | Good 5.2% |
| Immigrants | Argentina | 78.7 /100 | #148 | Good 5.2% |