Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Unemployment
COMPARE
Ethiopian
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
Female Unemployment
Female Unemployment Comparison
Ethiopians
Immigrants from Kazakhstan
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
85.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
129th/ 347
METRIC RANK
5.1%
FEMALE UNEMPLOYMENT
80.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
143rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ethiopian vs Immigrants from Kazakhstan Female Unemployment Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 222,927,979 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Ethiopians and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 5.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 124,276,021 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Kazakhstan and unemploymnet rate among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.267 and weighted average of 5.1%, a difference of 0.56%.
Female Unemployment Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ethiopian | Immigrants from Kazakhstan |
Minimum | 2.5% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 19.3% | 11.6% |
Range | 16.8% | 10.0% |
Mean | 5.7% | 5.3% |
Median | 5.1% | 5.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 4.5% | 4.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 6.1% | 5.9% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 1.6% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 2.4% | 1.7% |
Demographics Similar to Ethiopians and Immigrants from Kazakhstan by Female Unemployment
In terms of female unemployment, the demographic groups most similar to Ethiopians are Chilean (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Maltese (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Hungary (5.1%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (5.1%, a difference of 0.050%), and Immigrants from Korea (5.1%, a difference of 0.080%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Kazakhstan are Palestinian (5.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Jordan (5.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Eastern Europe (5.1%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Oceania (5.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Norway (5.2%, a difference of 0.13%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Unemployment |
Immigrants | Korea | 86.3 /100 | #126 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hungary | 86.0 /100 | #127 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chileans | 85.8 /100 | #128 | Excellent 5.1% |
Ethiopians | 85.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 5.1% |
Maltese | 85.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 85.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 85.0 /100 | #132 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Hong Kong | 84.8 /100 | #133 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 84.6 /100 | #134 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 84.6 /100 | #135 | Excellent 5.1% |
Indians (Asian) | 84.2 /100 | #136 | Excellent 5.1% |
Pakistanis | 83.8 /100 | #137 | Excellent 5.1% |
Chickasaw | 83.2 /100 | #138 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Asia | 83.0 /100 | #139 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | France | 82.7 /100 | #140 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 81.5 /100 | #141 | Excellent 5.1% |
Palestinians | 80.8 /100 | #142 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 80.7 /100 | #143 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.4 /100 | #144 | Excellent 5.1% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 79.5 /100 | #145 | Good 5.2% |
Immigrants | Norway | 79.4 /100 | #146 | Good 5.2% |