Immigrants from Belgium vs Slovene Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,025,757 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.708 and weighted average of 14.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 257,332,040 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Slovenes and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.303 and weighted average of 14.6%, a difference of 0.87%.

Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary

Measurement	Immigrants from Belgium	Slovene
Minimum	2.3%	1.5%
Maximum	100.0%	60.0%
Range	97.7%	58.5%
Mean	19.4%	17.2%
Median	14.3%	13.6%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	11.6%	9.5%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.4%	19.9%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	8.8%	10.4%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	17.1%	11.9%
Standard Deviation (Population)	17.0%	11.8%

Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Belgium and Slovenes by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16

In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Sweden (14.5%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Philippines (14.4%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Europe (14.4%, a difference of 0.30%), Scandinavian (14.4%, a difference of 0.35%), and Laotian (14.5%, a difference of 0.41%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Slovenes are Immigrants from Netherlands (14.6%, a difference of 0.030%), European (14.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Austria (14.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Taiwanese (14.6%, a difference of 0.15%), and Immigrants from Poland (14.6%, a difference of 0.16%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Immigrants \| Bulgaria	98.8 /100 \| #58	Exceptional 14.4%
Zimbabweans	98.8 /100 \| #59	Exceptional 14.4%
Poles	98.7 /100 \| #60	Exceptional 14.4%
Cambodians	98.7 /100 \| #61	Exceptional 14.4%
Scandinavians	98.7 /100 \| #62	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Europe	98.7 /100 \| #63	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Philippines	98.6 /100 \| #64	Exceptional 14.4%
Immigrants \| Sweden	98.6 /100 \| #65	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Belgium	98.5 /100 \| #66	Exceptional 14.5%
Laotians	98.4 /100 \| #67	Exceptional 14.5%
Immigrants \| Argentina	98.3 /100 \| #68	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Poland	98.2 /100 \| #69	Exceptional 14.6%
Europeans	98.1 /100 \| #70	Exceptional 14.6%
Slovenes	98.1 /100 \| #71	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Netherlands	98.1 /100 \| #72	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Austria	98.0 /100 \| #73	Exceptional 14.6%
Taiwanese	98.0 /100 \| #74	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Eastern Europe	98.0 /100 \| #75	Exceptional 14.6%
Immigrants \| Russia	97.9 /100 \| #76	Exceptional 14.7%
Tlingit-Haida	97.9 /100 \| #77	Exceptional 14.7%
Argentineans	97.9 /100 \| #78	Exceptional 14.7%