Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Female Poverty
COMPARE
Zimbabwean
Okinawan
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Zimbabweans
Okinawans
12.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
97.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
73rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.4%
FEMALE POVERTY
96.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Zimbabwean vs Okinawan Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 69,185,827 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Zimbabweans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.277 and weighted average of 12.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 73,724,084 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of Okinawans and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.079 and weighted average of 12.4%, a difference of 0.98%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Zimbabwean | Okinawan |
| Minimum | 2.2% | 0.59% |
| Maximum | 21.7% | 28.0% |
| Range | 19.5% | 27.4% |
| Mean | 10.3% | 10.9% |
| Median | 9.7% | 10.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.8% | 5.5% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.6% | 14.2% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 7.8% | 8.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 5.3% | 6.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 5.2% | 6.2% |
Demographics Similar to Zimbabweans and Okinawans by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Zimbabweans are Immigrants from Canada (12.3%, a difference of 0.010%), Cambodian (12.2%, a difference of 0.020%), Carpatho Rusyn (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), European (12.3%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Belgium (12.2%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Okinawans are Dutch (12.4%, a difference of 0.020%), Irish (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Finnish (12.4%, a difference of 0.050%), Northern European (12.4%, a difference of 0.10%), and English (12.4%, a difference of 0.24%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Belgium | 97.7 /100 | #70 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 97.6 /100 | #71 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Cambodians | 97.5 /100 | #72 | Exceptional 12.2% |
| Zimbabweans | 97.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Canada | 97.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Europeans | 97.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.2 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Serbians | 97.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Egyptians | 97.2 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Slovaks | 97.1 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | Sweden | 97.1 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Immigrants | England | 96.9 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.3% |
| Northern Europeans | 96.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Irish | 96.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Dutch | 96.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Okinawans | 96.4 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Finns | 96.4 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| English | 96.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.4% |
| Immigrants | Denmark | 95.8 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.4% |