Vietnamese vs Ottawa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Vietnamese
Ottawa
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Vietnamese
Ottawa
19.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
261st/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
259th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Vietnamese vs Ottawa Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,480,173 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Vietnamese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.407 and weighted average of 19.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 49,714,849 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Ottawa and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.000 and weighted average of 19.4%, a difference of 0.67%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Vietnamese | Ottawa |
Minimum | 0.61% | 6.1% |
Maximum | 51.8% | 46.9% |
Range | 51.2% | 40.9% |
Mean | 20.1% | 20.4% |
Median | 17.1% | 19.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.8% | 13.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 25.3% | 23.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.6% | 9.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.4% | 9.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.3% | 9.3% |
Demographics Similar to Vietnamese and Ottawa by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Vietnamese are Mexican American Indian (19.5%, a difference of 0.090%), Chickasaw (19.6%, a difference of 0.52%), Immigrants from Burma/Myanmar (19.7%, a difference of 0.64%), Jamaican (19.7%, a difference of 0.76%), and Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.77%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Ottawa are Salvadoran (19.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Guyanese (19.4%, a difference of 0.23%), Trinidadian and Tobagonian (19.3%, a difference of 0.47%), Immigrants from Ecuador (19.3%, a difference of 0.54%), and Immigrants from Western Africa (19.3%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Cape Verdeans | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Middle Africa | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 19.2% |
Immigrants | Guyana | 0.3 /100 | #253 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #254 | Tragic 19.3% |
Immigrants | Ecuador | 0.3 /100 | #255 | Tragic 19.3% |
Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 19.3% |
Guyanese | 0.2 /100 | #257 | Tragic 19.4% |
Salvadorans | 0.2 /100 | #258 | Tragic 19.4% |
Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #259 | Tragic 19.4% |
Mexican American Indians | 0.2 /100 | #260 | Tragic 19.5% |
Vietnamese | 0.2 /100 | #261 | Tragic 19.5% |
Chickasaw | 0.1 /100 | #262 | Tragic 19.6% |
Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.1 /100 | #263 | Tragic 19.7% |
Jamaicans | 0.1 /100 | #264 | Tragic 19.7% |
Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #265 | Tragic 19.8% |
Spanish Americans | 0.1 /100 | #266 | Tragic 19.8% |
Immigrants | Bangladesh | 0.1 /100 | #267 | Tragic 19.9% |
Spanish American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #268 | Tragic 19.9% |
Liberians | 0.1 /100 | #269 | Tragic 19.9% |
Cherokee | 0.1 /100 | #270 | Tragic 19.9% |