Ugandan vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Ugandan
Swiss
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Ugandans
Swiss
17.2%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
17.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
203rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Ugandan vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 93,523,032 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Ugandans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.114 and weighted average of 17.2%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 16.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Ugandan | Swiss |
Minimum | 2.1% | 4.8% |
Maximum | 51.6% | 52.5% |
Range | 49.5% | 47.7% |
Mean | 17.1% | 16.6% |
Median | 16.4% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.5% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 17.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.9% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.8% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.7% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Ugandans by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Ugandans are Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Kenya (17.2%, a difference of 0.060%), Immigrants from Uzbekistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.70%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (17.1%, a difference of 0.85%), and Immigrants from Lebanon (17.1%, a difference of 0.88%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Celtics | 25.2 /100 | #196 | Fair 17.0% |
Spaniards | 24.9 /100 | #197 | Fair 17.0% |
Immigrants | Lebanon | 22.6 /100 | #198 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 22.4 /100 | #199 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |