Cree vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Cree
Swiss
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Cree
Swiss
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Cree vs Swiss Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,883,921 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 452,044,614 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Swiss and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.273 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 25.4%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Cree | Swiss |
Minimum | 1.8% | 4.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 52.5% |
Range | 98.2% | 47.7% |
Mean | 24.0% | 16.6% |
Median | 19.0% | 14.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 10.7% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 28.2% | 17.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 17.5% | 6.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 19.5% | 10.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 19.2% | 10.3% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Cree by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.35%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Swiss by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Swiss are Australian (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.060%), Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Argentineans | 97.9 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |