Turkish vs Polish In Labor Force | Age 35-44
COMPARE
Turkish
Polish
In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Comparison
Turks
Poles
85.1%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
54th/ 347
METRIC RANK
85.2%
IN LABOR FORCE | AGE 35-44
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs Polish In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 271,726,396 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.243 and weighted average of 85.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 559,917,844 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Poles and labor force participation rate among population between the ages 35 and 44 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.100 and weighted average of 85.2%, a difference of 0.13%.

In Labor Force | Age 35-44 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Turkish | Polish |
| Minimum | 64.0% | 37.5% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
| Range | 36.0% | 62.5% |
| Mean | 85.1% | 86.4% |
| Median | 85.5% | 86.6% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 83.2% | 85.2% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 87.4% | 90.9% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.2% | 5.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 6.5% | 11.1% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 6.4% | 11.1% |
Demographics Similar to Turks and Poles by In Labor Force | Age 35-44
In terms of in labor force | age 35-44, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Soviet Union (85.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Croatia (85.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Taiwanese (85.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Kenya (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%), and Chinese (85.1%, a difference of 0.030%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Lithuanian (85.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Bulgaria (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), Macedonian (85.2%, a difference of 0.010%), and Immigrants from Poland (85.2%, a difference of 0.020%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | In Labor Force | Age 35-44 |
| Immigrants | Poland | 99.8 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Macedonians | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Poles | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Lithuanians | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Hong Kong | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| German Russians | 99.8 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Eritrea | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Croatians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Thais | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 85.2% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Kenya | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Taiwanese | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Turks | 99.5 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Soviet Union | 99.5 /100 | #55 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Immigrants | Croatia | 99.5 /100 | #56 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Chinese | 99.4 /100 | #57 | Exceptional 85.1% |
| Slovaks | 99.4 /100 | #58 | Exceptional 85.1% |