Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from China
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Immigrants from Asia
Immigrants from China
13.8%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
46th/ 347
METRIC RANK
13.3%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
27th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Immigrants from Asia vs Immigrants from China Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 538,871,669 people shows a moderate negative correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Asia and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.440 and weighted average of 13.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 450,826,325 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from China and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.271 and weighted average of 13.3%, a difference of 4.3%.

Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Immigrants from Asia | Immigrants from China |
Minimum | 2.1% | 1.6% |
Maximum | 24.4% | 29.3% |
Range | 22.3% | 27.7% |
Mean | 11.6% | 11.7% |
Median | 11.5% | 11.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.3% | 8.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.0% | 13.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.6% | 5.2% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.2% | 5.0% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Asia and Immigrants from China by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Asia are Czech (13.8%, a difference of 0.29%), Greek (13.8%, a difference of 0.34%), Immigrants from Moldova (13.8%, a difference of 0.51%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (13.8%, a difference of 0.57%), and Croatian (13.8%, a difference of 0.65%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from China are Assyrian/Chaldean/Syriac (13.3%, a difference of 0.24%), Bolivian (13.2%, a difference of 0.29%), Swedish (13.3%, a difference of 0.42%), Turkish (13.4%, a difference of 0.72%), and Danish (13.4%, a difference of 0.93%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
Bolivians | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.2% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.7 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.3% |
Turks | 99.7 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Danes | 99.7 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Tongans | 99.7 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.4% |
Asians | 99.6 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Russians | 99.6 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Lithuanians | 99.6 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.5 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.5 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | Scotland | 99.4 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 13.7% |
Croatians | 99.4 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.3 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Moldova | 99.3 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Greeks | 99.3 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Czechs | 99.3 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Asia | 99.2 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 13.8% |