Turkish vs English Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Turkish
English
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Turks
English
13.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
31st/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.1%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
94.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
110th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Turkish vs English Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 268,078,703 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Turks and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.344 and weighted average of 13.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 556,516,168 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of English and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.612 and weighted average of 15.1%, a difference of 11.5%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Turkish | English |
Minimum | 0.40% | 4.3% |
Maximum | 66.7% | 100.0% |
Range | 66.3% | 95.7% |
Mean | 13.5% | 25.5% |
Median | 10.7% | 16.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 5.9% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 14.8% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.9% | 15.8% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 12.7% | 23.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 12.5% | 23.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Turks by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Turks are Swedish (13.6%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from China (13.6%, a difference of 0.090%), Cypriot (13.6%, a difference of 0.18%), Danish (13.6%, a difference of 0.27%), and Eastern European (13.5%, a difference of 0.37%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.8 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Okinawans | 99.8 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Immigrants | Bolivia | 99.8 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Asians | 99.8 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Eastern Europeans | 99.8 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 13.5% |
Cypriots | 99.8 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Swedes | 99.8 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Turks | 99.8 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Immigrants | China | 99.8 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Danes | 99.8 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Assyrians/Chaldeans/Syriacs | 99.8 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 13.6% |
Russians | 99.7 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 13.8% |
Immigrants | Sri Lanka | 99.6 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 13.9% |
Demographics Similar to English by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to English are Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Basque (15.2%, a difference of 0.25%), Pakistani (15.1%, a difference of 0.26%), Irish (15.2%, a difference of 0.29%), and Immigrants from England (15.1%, a difference of 0.30%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Immigrants | Denmark | 95.6 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.4 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Dutch | 95.4 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 15.0% |
Serbians | 95.2 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Jordanians | 95.1 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | England | 94.8 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Pakistanis | 94.7 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 15.1% |
English | 94.3 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 15.1% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 94.2 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Basques | 93.8 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Irish | 93.8 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.6 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Armenians | 93.6 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 93.5 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 15.2% |
Immigrants | Vietnam | 93.5 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.2% |