Taiwanese vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
COMPARE
Taiwanese
Israeli
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Comparison
Taiwanese
Israelis
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
85th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.9%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG BOYS UNDER 16
76.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
156th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Taiwanese vs Israeli Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 31,649,664 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Taiwanese and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.164 and weighted average of 14.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 208,424,853 people shows a moderate positive correlation between the proportion of Israelis and poverty level among boys under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.450 and weighted average of 15.9%, a difference of 7.4%.
Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Taiwanese | Israeli |
Minimum | 1.1% | 2.9% |
Maximum | 38.2% | 34.4% |
Range | 37.2% | 31.5% |
Mean | 13.8% | 16.1% |
Median | 13.2% | 15.5% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 6.3% | 9.6% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 18.1% | 21.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 11.8% | 11.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 8.7% | 8.3% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 8.5% | 8.2% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
Demographics Similar to Taiwanese by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Taiwanese are Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), German (14.8%, a difference of 0.070%), Northern European (14.8%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from North America (14.8%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from South Africa (14.8%, a difference of 0.16%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Egyptians | 97.8 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Europe | 97.8 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Russia | 97.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.6 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Taiwanese | 97.3 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Germans | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | North America | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Argentina | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 97.1 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Paraguayans | 96.8 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Argentineans | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Demographics Similar to Israelis by Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16
In terms of child poverty among boys under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Israelis are French Canadian (15.9%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Nepal (15.9%, a difference of 0.090%), Yugoslavian (15.9%, a difference of 0.10%), Syrian (15.9%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Chile (15.9%, a difference of 0.27%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Boys Under 16 |
Slovaks | 80.3 /100 | #149 | Excellent 15.8% |
Immigrants | Jordan | 80.2 /100 | #150 | Excellent 15.8% |
Puget Sound Salish | 79.8 /100 | #151 | Good 15.8% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 79.5 /100 | #152 | Good 15.8% |
French | 78.7 /100 | #153 | Good 15.8% |
Syrians | 77.5 /100 | #154 | Good 15.9% |
French Canadians | 76.6 /100 | #155 | Good 15.9% |
Israelis | 76.5 /100 | #156 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Nepal | 76.0 /100 | #157 | Good 15.9% |
Yugoslavians | 75.9 /100 | #158 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Chile | 74.8 /100 | #159 | Good 15.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 71.3 /100 | #160 | Good 16.0% |
Immigrants | Oceania | 71.3 /100 | #161 | Good 16.0% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 69.6 /100 | #162 | Good 16.1% |
Costa Ricans | 68.1 /100 | #163 | Good 16.1% |