Sudanese vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Sudanese
Australian
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Sudanese
Australians
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
14.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
97.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
86th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Sudanese vs Australian Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,721,047 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 18.6%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 221,150,197 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Australians and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.510 and weighted average of 14.8%, a difference of 25.7%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Sudanese | Australian |
Minimum | 0.90% | 5.3% |
Maximum | 74.6% | 60.2% |
Range | 73.7% | 54.9% |
Mean | 21.0% | 19.5% |
Median | 17.3% | 15.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 13.3% | 11.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 22.4% | 26.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 9.1% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.7% | 11.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.5% | 11.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Sudanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Nepalese (18.6%, a difference of 0.12%), Alsatian (18.6%, a difference of 0.13%), and Immigrants from Nigeria (18.6%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 1.0 /100 | #238 | Tragic 18.7% |
Marshallese | 0.9 /100 | #239 | Tragic 18.7% |
Nigerians | 0.9 /100 | #240 | Tragic 18.7% |
Demographics Similar to Australians by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Australians are Finnish (14.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Swiss (14.8%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Canada (14.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Jordanian (14.8%, a difference of 0.14%), and Soviet Union (14.8%, a difference of 0.15%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Turkey | 97.9 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Egyptians | 97.9 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Macedonians | 97.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 14.7% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Soviet Union | 97.3 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Swiss | 97.2 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Australians | 97.2 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Finns | 97.2 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Canada | 97.1 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Jordanians | 97.1 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Northern Europeans | 97.0 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Immigrants | Belarus | 97.0 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 14.8% |
Austrians | 96.7 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 14.9% |
Immigrants | North America | 96.6 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 14.9% |