South American vs Immigrants from Italy Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Immigrants from Italy
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Immigrants from Italy
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.2%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
97.4/ 100
METRIC RATING
97th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Immigrants from Italy Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,067,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 286,137,274 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Italy and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.549 and weighted average of 12.2%, a difference of 0.74%.
Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Immigrants from Italy |
Minimum | 0.77% | 4.4% |
Maximum | 27.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 27.1% | 95.6% |
Mean | 11.5% | 19.9% |
Median | 11.3% | 12.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 18.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 7.6% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 24.6% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 23.7% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Immigrants from Italy by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Italy are Guamanian/Chamorro (12.2%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Cuba (12.2%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Sweden (12.2%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Australia (12.2%, a difference of 0.16%), and Immigrants from Latvia (12.2%, a difference of 0.19%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Colombians | 97.8 /100 | #94 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Mongolians | 97.7 /100 | #95 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 97.5 /100 | #96 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Italy | 97.4 /100 | #97 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Guamanians/Chamorros | 97.4 /100 | #98 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Cuba | 97.3 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Australia | 97.1 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Latvia | 97.0 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 12.2% |
Immigrants | Europe | 97.0 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 12.2% |