South American vs Armenian Single Male Poverty
COMPARE
South American
Armenian
Single Male Poverty
Single Male Poverty Comparison
South Americans
Armenians
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
87th/ 347
METRIC RANK
12.1%
SINGLE MALE POVERTY
98.7/ 100
METRIC RATING
80th/ 347
METRIC RANK
South American vs Armenian Single Male Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 426,067,746 people shows a slight negative correlation between the proportion of South Americans and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.096 and weighted average of 12.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 275,861,464 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Armenians and poverty level among single males in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.248 and weighted average of 12.1%, a difference of 0.22%.

Single Male Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | South American | Armenian |
Minimum | 0.77% | 3.3% |
Maximum | 27.8% | 21.2% |
Range | 27.1% | 17.9% |
Mean | 11.5% | 11.3% |
Median | 11.3% | 11.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 9.1% | 9.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 13.3% | 13.5% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 4.1% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 4.0% | 4.0% |
Demographics Similar to South Americans and Armenians by Single Male Poverty
In terms of single male poverty, the demographic groups most similar to South Americans are Immigrants from Eritrea (12.1%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Israel (12.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.13%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Armenians are Immigrants from South America (12.1%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Colombia (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Chile (12.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (12.1%, a difference of 0.11%), and Turkish (12.1%, a difference of 0.18%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Male Poverty |
Argentineans | 99.5 /100 | #73 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Chileans | 99.5 /100 | #74 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Uruguayans | 99.4 /100 | #75 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 99.4 /100 | #76 | Exceptional 11.9% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.2 /100 | #77 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Venezuela | 99.1 /100 | #78 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 99.0 /100 | #79 | Exceptional 12.0% |
Armenians | 98.7 /100 | #80 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | South America | 98.7 /100 | #81 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 98.6 /100 | #82 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Chile | 98.6 /100 | #83 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Czechoslovakia | 98.6 /100 | #84 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Turks | 98.5 /100 | #85 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Israel | 98.5 /100 | #86 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South Americans | 98.5 /100 | #87 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Eritrea | 98.5 /100 | #88 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Ireland | 98.3 /100 | #89 | Exceptional 12.1% |
South American Indians | 98.3 /100 | #90 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Turkey | 98.2 /100 | #91 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Spanish American Indians | 98.0 /100 | #92 | Exceptional 12.1% |
Immigrants | Bosnia and Herzegovina | 97.9 /100 | #93 | Exceptional 12.1% |