Scottish vs Mongolian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
COMPARE
Scottish
Mongolian
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Comparison
Scottish
Mongolians
15.0%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
92.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
119th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.2%
CHILD POVERTY UNDER THE AGE OF 16
89.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
130th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scottish vs Mongolian Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 554,294,508 people shows a strong positive correlation between the proportion of Scottish and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.746 and weighted average of 15.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 140,038,106 people shows a poor negative correlation between the proportion of Mongolians and poverty level among children under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.149 and weighted average of 15.2%, a difference of 1.1%.
Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scottish | Mongolian |
| Minimum | 5.6% | 0.81% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 43.8% |
| Range | 94.4% | 43.0% |
| Mean | 37.1% | 14.1% |
| Median | 21.1% | 12.9% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.9% | 7.0% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 53.8% | 19.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 38.9% | 12.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 31.5% | 8.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 31.2% | 8.7% |
Demographics Similar to Scottish and Mongolians by Child Poverty Under the Age of 16
In terms of child poverty under the age of 16, the demographic groups most similar to Scottish are South African (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Zimbabwe (15.0%, a difference of 0.090%), Immigrants from Malaysia (15.0%, a difference of 0.15%), Immigrants from Norway (15.0%, a difference of 0.21%), and Pakistani (15.0%, a difference of 0.29%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Mongolians are Armenian (15.2%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (15.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Canadian (15.2%, a difference of 0.12%), Immigrants from South Eastern Asia (15.2%, a difference of 0.17%), and Immigrants from Kazakhstan (15.1%, a difference of 0.25%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Under the Age of 16 |
| Sri Lankans | 93.2 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Ukraine | 93.1 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 93.1 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 14.9% |
| Immigrants | Norway | 92.8 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Malaysia | 92.6 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Scottish | 92.3 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| South Africans | 92.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 92.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Pakistanis | 91.7 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 15.0% |
| Immigrants | Brazil | 91.1 /100 | #123 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Czechoslovakians | 91.0 /100 | #124 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Palestinians | 90.9 /100 | #125 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Portuguese | 90.6 /100 | #126 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Western Europe | 90.3 /100 | #127 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 90.2 /100 | #128 | Exceptional 15.1% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 89.7 /100 | #129 | Excellent 15.1% |
| Mongolians | 89.5 /100 | #130 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Armenians | 89.4 /100 | #131 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Canadians | 89.1 /100 | #132 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Immigrants | South Eastern Asia | 89.0 /100 | #133 | Excellent 15.2% |
| Native Hawaiians | 88.7 /100 | #134 | Excellent 15.2% |