Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Western Africa Female Poverty
COMPARE
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Western Africa
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Scotch-Irish
Immigrants from Western Africa
13.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
62.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
165th/ 347
METRIC RANK
15.3%
FEMALE POVERTY
0.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
250th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Scotch-Irish vs Immigrants from Western Africa Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 547,935,242 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Scotch-Irish and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.558 and weighted average of 13.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 357,511,733 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Western Africa and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.218 and weighted average of 15.3%, a difference of 15.4%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Scotch-Irish | Immigrants from Western Africa |
| Minimum | 2.6% | 5.9% |
| Maximum | 100.0% | 45.5% |
| Range | 97.4% | 39.6% |
| Mean | 19.2% | 16.9% |
| Median | 14.6% | 15.1% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 12.8% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.5% | 18.7% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.8% | 5.9% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 14.9% | 7.3% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 14.8% | 7.2% |
Similar Demographics by Female Poverty
Demographics Similar to Scotch-Irish by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Scotch-Irish are Ethiopian (13.3%, a difference of 0.020%), Guamanian/Chamorro (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Albania (13.3%, a difference of 0.030%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (13.3%, a difference of 0.040%), and Immigrants from Nepal (13.3%, a difference of 0.070%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 67.3 /100 | #158 | Good 13.2% |
| Costa Ricans | 63.6 /100 | #159 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Nepal | 62.7 /100 | #160 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 62.5 /100 | #161 | Good 13.3% |
| Guamanians/Chamorros | 62.4 /100 | #162 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Albania | 62.4 /100 | #163 | Good 13.3% |
| Ethiopians | 62.3 /100 | #164 | Good 13.3% |
| Scotch-Irish | 62.1 /100 | #165 | Good 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Oceania | 59.7 /100 | #166 | Average 13.3% |
| Immigrants | Chile | 57.4 /100 | #167 | Average 13.3% |
| Aleuts | 56.7 /100 | #168 | Average 13.4% |
| Lebanese | 55.9 /100 | #169 | Average 13.4% |
| Colombians | 55.7 /100 | #170 | Average 13.4% |
| Whites/Caucasians | 54.6 /100 | #171 | Average 13.4% |
| Mongolians | 53.6 /100 | #172 | Average 13.4% |
Demographics Similar to Immigrants from Western Africa by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Western Africa are Salvadoran (15.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Trinidad and Tobago (15.4%, a difference of 0.16%), Immigrants from Ghana (15.3%, a difference of 0.18%), Cuban (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%), and Potawatomi (15.3%, a difference of 0.19%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
| Nicaraguans | 0.3 /100 | #243 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Ecuadorians | 0.3 /100 | #244 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Spanish American Indians | 0.3 /100 | #245 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Cubans | 0.3 /100 | #246 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Potawatomi | 0.3 /100 | #247 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Ghana | 0.3 /100 | #248 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Salvadorans | 0.3 /100 | #249 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Western Africa | 0.3 /100 | #250 | Tragic 15.3% |
| Immigrants | Trinidad and Tobago | 0.3 /100 | #251 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Immigrants | Burma/Myanmar | 0.3 /100 | #252 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Liberians | 0.2 /100 | #253 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Trinidadians and Tobagonians | 0.2 /100 | #254 | Tragic 15.4% |
| Ottawa | 0.2 /100 | #255 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Jamaicans | 0.2 /100 | #256 | Tragic 15.5% |
| Immigrants | Jamaica | 0.1 /100 | #257 | Tragic 15.6% |