Salvadoran vs Immigrants from Uzbekistan Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 390,935,430 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Salvadorans and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.033 and weighted average of 19.1%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 117,709,587 people shows no correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Uzbekistan and poverty level among females between the ages 18 and 24 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of -0.048 and weighted average of 19.2%, a difference of 0.66%.

Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds Correlation Summary

Measurement	Salvadoran	Immigrants from Uzbekistan
Minimum	1.7%	2.0%
Maximum	35.6%	54.7%
Range	34.0%	52.8%
Mean	18.3%	18.4%
Median	17.9%	17.4%
Interquartile 25% (IQ1)	15.4%	11.2%
Interquartile 75% (IQ3)	20.9%	23.2%
Interquartile Range (IQR)	5.5%	12.0%
Standard Deviation (Sample)	6.2%	9.8%
Standard Deviation (Population)	6.1%	9.8%

Demographics Similar to Salvadorans and Immigrants from Uzbekistan by Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds

In terms of female poverty among 18-24 year olds, the demographic groups most similar to Salvadorans are Immigrants from Jordan (19.1%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Czechoslovakia (19.1%, a difference of 0.080%), Chilean (19.1%, a difference of 0.10%), Ecuadorian (19.1%, a difference of 0.19%), and Immigrants from Caribbean (19.1%, a difference of 0.21%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Uzbekistan are Immigrants from Syria (19.2%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sri Lanka (19.2%, a difference of 0.090%), Laotian (19.2%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Serbia (19.2%, a difference of 0.12%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (19.2%, a difference of 0.24%).

Demographics	Rating \| Rank	Female Poverty Among 18-24 Year Olds
Filipinos	98.9 /100 \| #92	Exceptional 19.0%
Haitians	98.9 /100 \| #93	Exceptional 19.0%
Ukrainians	98.8 /100 \| #94	Exceptional 19.0%
Guamanians/Chamorros	98.8 /100 \| #95	Exceptional 19.0%
Sierra Leoneans	98.7 /100 \| #96	Exceptional 19.0%
Salvadorans	98.4 /100 \| #97	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Jordan	98.4 /100 \| #98	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Czechoslovakia	98.3 /100 \| #99	Exceptional 19.1%
Chileans	98.3 /100 \| #100	Exceptional 19.1%
Ecuadorians	98.1 /100 \| #101	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Caribbean	98.1 /100 \| #102	Exceptional 19.1%
Serbians	98.0 /100 \| #103	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Afghanistan	98.0 /100 \| #104	Exceptional 19.1%
Immigrants \| Ecuador	97.8 /100 \| #105	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Sierra Leone	97.8 /100 \| #106	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Sri Lanka	97.5 /100 \| #107	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Uzbekistan	97.3 /100 \| #108	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Syria	97.2 /100 \| #109	Exceptional 19.2%
Laotians	97.1 /100 \| #110	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| Serbia	97.1 /100 \| #111	Exceptional 19.2%
Immigrants \| El Salvador	96.5 /100 \| #112	Exceptional 19.3%