Russian vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Female Poverty
COMPARE
Russian
Immigrants from Northern Europe
Female Poverty
Female Poverty Comparison
Russians
Immigrants from Northern Europe
11.8%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
38th/ 347
METRIC RANK
11.6%
FEMALE POVERTY
99.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
25th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Russian vs Immigrants from Northern Europe Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 511,408,549 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Russians and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.553 and weighted average of 11.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 476,749,265 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Northern Europe and poverty level among females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.570 and weighted average of 11.6%, a difference of 1.5%.
Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Russian | Immigrants from Northern Europe |
Minimum | 3.6% | 0.47% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 64.6% |
Range | 96.4% | 64.1% |
Mean | 17.7% | 13.5% |
Median | 11.4% | 9.1% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 8.2% | 7.2% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 16.5% | 17.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 8.2% | 10.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 18.5% | 11.4% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 18.4% | 11.3% |
Demographics Similar to Russians and Immigrants from Northern Europe by Female Poverty
In terms of female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Russians are Immigrants from Greece (11.8%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Pakistan (11.8%, a difference of 0.11%), Immigrants from Poland (11.8%, a difference of 0.21%), Macedonian (11.8%, a difference of 0.26%), and Immigrants from Iran (11.8%, a difference of 0.28%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Northern Europe are Croatian (11.6%, a difference of 0.0%), Iranian (11.7%, a difference of 0.11%), Luxembourger (11.6%, a difference of 0.26%), Burmese (11.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Immigrants from Korea (11.7%, a difference of 0.32%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Female Poverty |
Italians | 99.7 /100 | #21 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Swedes | 99.7 /100 | #22 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Burmese | 99.7 /100 | #23 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Luxembourgers | 99.7 /100 | #24 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Immigrants | Northern Europe | 99.6 /100 | #25 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Croatians | 99.6 /100 | #26 | Exceptional 11.6% |
Iranians | 99.6 /100 | #27 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | Korea | 99.6 /100 | #28 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Immigrants | North Macedonia | 99.6 /100 | #29 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Greeks | 99.5 /100 | #30 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Poles | 99.5 /100 | #31 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Danes | 99.5 /100 | #32 | Exceptional 11.7% |
Cypriots | 99.5 /100 | #33 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Singapore | 99.4 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Iran | 99.4 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.4 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Greece | 99.3 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Russians | 99.3 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Immigrants | Poland | 99.3 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Macedonians | 99.3 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 11.8% |
Czechs | 99.2 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 11.9% |