Polish vs Immigrants from Belgium Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Immigrants from Belgium
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Immigrants from Belgium
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.8%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
97.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
101st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Immigrants from Belgium Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 145,269,497 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Belgium and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.179 and weighted average of 19.8%, a difference of 0.84%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
Measurement | Polish | Immigrants from Belgium |
Minimum | 5.1% | 6.3% |
Maximum | 77.8% | 100.0% |
Range | 72.7% | 93.7% |
Mean | 19.6% | 30.1% |
Median | 18.3% | 20.4% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 17.9% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 34.7% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 16.9% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 23.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 23.5% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Immigrants from Belgium by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Belgium are Immigrants from Cameroon (19.8%, a difference of 0.010%), Immigrants from Southern Europe (19.9%, a difference of 0.13%), Ukrainian (19.8%, a difference of 0.18%), Chilean (19.9%, a difference of 0.25%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.26%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
Sierra Leoneans | 97.9 /100 | #99 | Exceptional 19.7% |
Ukrainians | 97.6 /100 | #100 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Belgium | 97.3 /100 | #101 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |