Polish vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
Polish
Native Hawaiian
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
Poles
Native Hawaiians
20.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
95.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
117th/ 347
METRIC RANK
19.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
96.6/ 100
METRIC RATING
108th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Polish vs Native Hawaiian Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 540,648,270 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of Poles and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.183 and weighted average of 20.0%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 328,771,814 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Native Hawaiians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.099 and weighted average of 19.9%, a difference of 0.42%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | Polish | Native Hawaiian |
| Minimum | 5.1% | 2.1% |
| Maximum | 77.8% | 61.4% |
| Range | 72.7% | 59.3% |
| Mean | 19.6% | 22.5% |
| Median | 18.3% | 20.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 15.0% | 12.1% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 21.4% | 30.6% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 6.4% | 18.4% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 9.3% | 12.8% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 9.3% | 12.8% |
Demographics Similar to Poles and Native Hawaiians by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to Poles are Immigrants from Kazakhstan (20.0%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Northern Africa (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Afghanistan (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Ethiopia (20.0%, a difference of 0.080%), and Immigrants from Zimbabwe (20.0%, a difference of 0.10%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Native Hawaiians are Colombian (19.9%, a difference of 0.0%), Immigrants from Western Asia (19.9%, a difference of 0.020%), Immigrants from Syria (19.9%, a difference of 0.050%), Ethiopian (19.9%, a difference of 0.070%), and Israeli (19.9%, a difference of 0.16%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Cameroon | 97.3 /100 | #102 | Exceptional 19.8% |
| Immigrants | Southern Europe | 97.1 /100 | #103 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Chileans | 96.9 /100 | #104 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Israelis | 96.9 /100 | #105 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Ethiopians | 96.7 /100 | #106 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Syria | 96.7 /100 | #107 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Native Hawaiians | 96.6 /100 | #108 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Colombians | 96.6 /100 | #109 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Immigrants | Western Asia | 96.5 /100 | #110 | Exceptional 19.9% |
| Carpatho Rusyns | 96.1 /100 | #111 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Netherlands | 96.0 /100 | #112 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Zimbabwe | 95.9 /100 | #113 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Colombia | 95.9 /100 | #114 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Northern Africa | 95.8 /100 | #115 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Kazakhstan | 95.7 /100 | #116 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Poles | 95.6 /100 | #117 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Afghanistan | 95.4 /100 | #118 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Ethiopia | 95.4 /100 | #119 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| South Americans | 95.1 /100 | #120 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | Switzerland | 95.1 /100 | #121 | Exceptional 20.0% |
| Immigrants | South America | 95.0 /100 | #122 | Exceptional 20.0% |