Osage vs Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Osage
Sioux
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Osage
Sioux
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
230th/ 347
METRIC RANK
25.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
336th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Osage vs Sioux Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 91,492,643 people shows a slight positive correlation between the proportion of Osage and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.094 and weighted average of 18.5%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 231,838,275 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Sioux and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.644 and weighted average of 25.6%, a difference of 38.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Osage | Sioux |
Minimum | 6.7% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 67.2% | 100.0% |
Range | 60.5% | 98.2% |
Mean | 21.1% | 45.0% |
Median | 19.5% | 35.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 14.0% | 19.5% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 24.8% | 64.6% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 10.8% | 45.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 11.6% | 28.8% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 11.4% | 28.7% |
Similar Demographics by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Demographics Similar to Osage by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Osage are Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.19%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.32%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.37%), and Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.43%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |
Nepalese | 1.1 /100 | #235 | Tragic 18.6% |
Alsatians | 1.1 /100 | #236 | Tragic 18.6% |
Immigrants | Nigeria | 1.0 /100 | #237 | Tragic 18.6% |
Demographics Similar to Sioux by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Sioux are Yup'ik (25.8%, a difference of 0.93%), Pueblo (25.2%, a difference of 1.5%), Menominee (25.0%, a difference of 2.2%), Cheyenne (26.3%, a difference of 2.7%), and Crow (26.4%, a difference of 3.1%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Kiowa | 0.0 /100 | #329 | Tragic 23.7% |
Immigrants | Dominican Republic | 0.0 /100 | #330 | Tragic 23.8% |
Apache | 0.0 /100 | #331 | Tragic 23.8% |
Natives/Alaskans | 0.0 /100 | #332 | Tragic 24.0% |
Blacks/African Americans | 0.0 /100 | #333 | Tragic 24.7% |
Menominee | 0.0 /100 | #334 | Tragic 25.0% |
Pueblo | 0.0 /100 | #335 | Tragic 25.2% |
Sioux | 0.0 /100 | #336 | Tragic 25.6% |
Yup'ik | 0.0 /100 | #337 | Tragic 25.8% |
Cheyenne | 0.0 /100 | #338 | Tragic 26.3% |
Crow | 0.0 /100 | #339 | Tragic 26.4% |
Yuman | 0.0 /100 | #340 | Tragic 27.1% |
Hopi | 0.0 /100 | #341 | Tragic 27.9% |
Pima | 0.0 /100 | #342 | Tragic 28.2% |
Immigrants | Yemen | 0.0 /100 | #343 | Tragic 29.5% |