Norwegian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Self-Care Disability
COMPARE
Norwegian
Immigrants from Pakistan
Self-Care Disability
Self-Care Disability Comparison
Norwegians
Immigrants from Pakistan
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
45th/ 347
METRIC RANK
2.3%
SELF-CARE DISABILITY
99.8/ 100
METRIC RATING
43rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Norwegian vs Immigrants from Pakistan Self-Care Disability Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 531,593,682 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Norwegians and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.296 and weighted average of 2.3%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 283,675,484 people shows a mild positive correlation between the proportion of Immigrants from Pakistan and percentage of population with self-care disability in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.355 and weighted average of 2.3%, a difference of 0.090%.
Self-Care Disability Correlation Summary
Measurement | Norwegian | Immigrants from Pakistan |
Minimum | 0.64% | 0.14% |
Maximum | 14.8% | 6.2% |
Range | 14.2% | 6.1% |
Mean | 2.6% | 2.5% |
Median | 2.2% | 2.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 1.9% | 2.0% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 2.5% | 2.8% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 0.60% | 0.78% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 1.9% | 0.95% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 1.9% | 0.94% |
Demographics Similar to Norwegians and Immigrants from Pakistan by Self-Care Disability
In terms of self-care disability, the demographic groups most similar to Norwegians are Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.13%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.23%), and Iranian (2.3%, a difference of 0.30%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Immigrants from Pakistan are Immigrants from South Africa (2.3%, a difference of 0.040%), Immigrants from Uganda (2.3%, a difference of 0.050%), Immigrants from Sudan (2.3%, a difference of 0.14%), Czech (2.3%, a difference of 0.17%), and Iranian (2.3%, a difference of 0.21%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Self-Care Disability |
Immigrants | Turkey | 99.9 /100 | #34 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Australia | 99.9 /100 | #35 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Lithuania | 99.9 /100 | #36 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sweden | 99.9 /100 | #37 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 99.9 /100 | #38 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Bulgaria | 99.8 /100 | #39 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Iranians | 99.8 /100 | #40 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 99.8 /100 | #41 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Uganda | 99.8 /100 | #42 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Pakistan | 99.8 /100 | #43 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | South Africa | 99.8 /100 | #44 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Norwegians | 99.8 /100 | #45 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Czechs | 99.8 /100 | #46 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Jordanians | 99.7 /100 | #47 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Malaysia | 99.7 /100 | #48 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Latvians | 99.7 /100 | #49 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Brazil | 99.7 /100 | #50 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Kenyans | 99.7 /100 | #51 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Immigrants | Serbia | 99.6 /100 | #52 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Australians | 99.6 /100 | #53 | Exceptional 2.3% |
Argentineans | 99.6 /100 | #54 | Exceptional 2.3% |