German Russian vs Central American Single Female Poverty
COMPARE
German Russian
Central American
Single Female Poverty
Single Female Poverty Comparison
German Russians
Central Americans
23.9%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
283rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
23.0%
SINGLE FEMALE POVERTY
0.2/ 100
METRIC RATING
265th/ 347
METRIC RANK
German Russian vs Central American Single Female Poverty Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 96,093,035 people shows a poor positive correlation between the proportion of German Russians and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.199 and weighted average of 23.9%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 494,457,156 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Central Americans and poverty level among single females in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.245 and weighted average of 23.0%, a difference of 3.9%.
Single Female Poverty Correlation Summary
| Measurement | German Russian | Central American |
| Minimum | 14.3% | 2.9% |
| Maximum | 55.7% | 65.2% |
| Range | 41.4% | 62.4% |
| Mean | 29.4% | 25.2% |
| Median | 25.0% | 23.0% |
| Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 22.9% | 21.4% |
| Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 36.6% | 27.8% |
| Interquartile Range (IQR) | 13.7% | 6.5% |
| Standard Deviation (Sample) | 10.9% | 10.7% |
| Standard Deviation (Population) | 10.7% | 10.6% |
Demographics Similar to German Russians and Central Americans by Single Female Poverty
In terms of single female poverty, the demographic groups most similar to German Russians are Immigrants from Dominica (23.9%, a difference of 0.11%), Guatemalan (23.8%, a difference of 0.14%), Immigrants from Zaire (23.8%, a difference of 0.20%), Immigrants from Latin America (23.7%, a difference of 0.71%), and Alaskan Athabascan (23.6%, a difference of 1.2%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Central Americans are Immigrants from Laos (22.9%, a difference of 0.17%), Immigrants from Micronesia (23.0%, a difference of 0.21%), Senegalese (23.0%, a difference of 0.27%), Fijian (23.1%, a difference of 0.34%), and Hmong (23.1%, a difference of 0.37%).
| Demographics | Rating | Rank | Single Female Poverty |
| Immigrants | Laos | 0.3 /100 | #264 | Tragic 22.9% |
| Central Americans | 0.2 /100 | #265 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Immigrants | Micronesia | 0.2 /100 | #266 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Senegalese | 0.2 /100 | #267 | Tragic 23.0% |
| Fijians | 0.2 /100 | #268 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Hmong | 0.2 /100 | #269 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Inupiat | 0.2 /100 | #270 | Tragic 23.1% |
| Sub-Saharan Africans | 0.1 /100 | #271 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Immigrants | Senegal | 0.1 /100 | #272 | Tragic 23.2% |
| Alaska Natives | 0.1 /100 | #273 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Marshallese | 0.1 /100 | #274 | Tragic 23.3% |
| Mexican American Indians | 0.1 /100 | #275 | Tragic 23.4% |
| Immigrants | Azores | 0.0 /100 | #276 | Tragic 23.5% |
| Pennsylvania Germans | 0.0 /100 | #277 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 0.0 /100 | #278 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Alaskan Athabascans | 0.0 /100 | #279 | Tragic 23.6% |
| Immigrants | Latin America | 0.0 /100 | #280 | Tragic 23.7% |
| Immigrants | Zaire | 0.0 /100 | #281 | Tragic 23.8% |
| Guatemalans | 0.0 /100 | #282 | Tragic 23.8% |
| German Russians | 0.0 /100 | #283 | Tragic 23.9% |
| Immigrants | Dominica | 0.0 /100 | #284 | Tragic 23.9% |