Moroccan vs Iraqi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Iraqi
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Iraqis
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
17.4%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
13.0/ 100
METRIC RATING
204th/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Iraqi Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 169,508,253 people shows a weak positive correlation between the proportion of Iraqis and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.249 and weighted average of 17.4%, a difference of 2.6%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Iraqi |
Minimum | 7.0% | 0.32% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 44.5% |
Range | 93.0% | 44.2% |
Mean | 26.4% | 16.5% |
Median | 18.1% | 14.9% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 11.4% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 19.3% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 8.0% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 8.9% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 8.9% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Iraqis by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Iraqis are Immigrants from Cameroon (17.4%, a difference of 0.10%), Delaware (17.4%, a difference of 0.37%), Hmong (17.5%, a difference of 0.62%), Ugandan (17.2%, a difference of 0.97%), and Immigrants from Sierra Leone (17.2%, a difference of 0.98%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Immigrants | Uzbekistan | 21.5 /100 | #200 | Fair 17.1% |
Immigrants | Kenya | 17.8 /100 | #201 | Poor 17.2% |
Immigrants | Sierra Leone | 17.6 /100 | #202 | Poor 17.2% |
Ugandans | 17.5 /100 | #203 | Poor 17.2% |
Iraqis | 13.0 /100 | #204 | Poor 17.4% |
Immigrants | Cameroon | 12.6 /100 | #205 | Poor 17.4% |
Delaware | 11.5 /100 | #206 | Poor 17.4% |
Hmong | 10.6 /100 | #207 | Poor 17.5% |
Sierra Leoneans | 8.9 /100 | #208 | Tragic 17.6% |
Panamanians | 8.7 /100 | #209 | Tragic 17.6% |
Immigrants | Immigrants | 7.3 /100 | #210 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Eastern Africa | 6.4 /100 | #211 | Tragic 17.7% |
Immigrants | Thailand | 6.3 /100 | #212 | Tragic 17.7% |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |