Moroccan vs Cree Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Cree
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Cree
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.5%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.3/ 100
METRIC RATING
231st/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Cree Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 75,883,921 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Cree and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.559 and weighted average of 18.5%, a difference of 4.1%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Cree |
Minimum | 7.0% | 1.8% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 100.0% |
Range | 93.0% | 98.2% |
Mean | 26.4% | 24.0% |
Median | 18.1% | 19.0% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 10.7% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 28.2% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 17.5% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 19.5% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 19.2% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Cree by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Pennsylvania German (17.8%, a difference of 0.12%), and Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Cree are Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.080%), Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.24%), Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.27%), Sudanese (18.6%, a difference of 0.28%), and Alaskan Athabascan (18.3%, a difference of 1.2%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Pennsylvania Germans | 5.7 /100 | #213 | Tragic 17.8% |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |