Moroccan vs Sudanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
COMPARE
Moroccan
Sudanese
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Comparison
Moroccans
Sudanese
17.8%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
5.5/ 100
METRIC RATING
216th/ 347
METRIC RANK
18.6%
CHILD POVERTY AMONG GIRLS UNDER 16
1.1/ 100
METRIC RATING
233rd/ 347
METRIC RANK
Moroccan vs Sudanese Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Chart
The statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 200,064,228 people shows a significant positive correlation between the proportion of Moroccans and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.671 and weighted average of 17.8%. Similarly, the statistical analysis conducted on geographies consisting of 109,721,047 people shows a substantial positive correlation between the proportion of Sudanese and poverty level among girls under the age of 16 in the United States with a correlation coefficient (R) of 0.551 and weighted average of 18.6%, a difference of 4.3%.
Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 Correlation Summary
Measurement | Moroccan | Sudanese |
Minimum | 7.0% | 0.90% |
Maximum | 100.0% | 74.6% |
Range | 93.0% | 73.7% |
Mean | 26.4% | 21.0% |
Median | 18.1% | 17.3% |
Interquartile 25% (IQ1) | 12.6% | 13.3% |
Interquartile 75% (IQ3) | 35.4% | 22.4% |
Interquartile Range (IQR) | 22.8% | 9.1% |
Standard Deviation (Sample) | 21.4% | 14.7% |
Standard Deviation (Population) | 21.1% | 14.5% |
Demographics Similar to Moroccans and Sudanese by Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16
In terms of child poverty among girls under 16, the demographic groups most similar to Moroccans are Japanese (17.8%, a difference of 0.090%), Malaysian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), German Russian (17.8%, a difference of 0.10%), Alaska Native (17.8%, a difference of 0.18%), and Immigrants from Panama (17.9%, a difference of 0.43%). Similarly, the demographic groups most similar to Sudanese are Immigrants from Sudan (18.6%, a difference of 0.040%), Fijian (18.6%, a difference of 0.070%), Cree (18.5%, a difference of 0.28%), Osage (18.5%, a difference of 0.37%), and Ghanaian (18.5%, a difference of 0.56%).
Demographics | Rating | Rank | Child Poverty Among Girls Under 16 |
Malaysians | 5.7 /100 | #214 | Tragic 17.8% |
German Russians | 5.7 /100 | #215 | Tragic 17.8% |
Moroccans | 5.5 /100 | #216 | Tragic 17.8% |
Japanese | 5.3 /100 | #217 | Tragic 17.8% |
Alaska Natives | 5.2 /100 | #218 | Tragic 17.8% |
Immigrants | Panama | 4.7 /100 | #219 | Tragic 17.9% |
Cubans | 4.1 /100 | #220 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Micronesia | 3.5 /100 | #221 | Tragic 18.0% |
Immigrants | Cambodia | 2.9 /100 | #222 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Armenia | 2.9 /100 | #223 | Tragic 18.1% |
Bermudans | 2.8 /100 | #224 | Tragic 18.1% |
Immigrants | Africa | 2.7 /100 | #225 | Tragic 18.2% |
Nicaraguans | 2.4 /100 | #226 | Tragic 18.2% |
Immigrants | Nonimmigrants | 2.0 /100 | #227 | Tragic 18.3% |
Alaskan Athabascans | 2.0 /100 | #228 | Tragic 18.3% |
Ghanaians | 1.4 /100 | #229 | Tragic 18.5% |
Osage | 1.3 /100 | #230 | Tragic 18.5% |
Cree | 1.3 /100 | #231 | Tragic 18.5% |
Immigrants | Sudan | 1.1 /100 | #232 | Tragic 18.6% |
Sudanese | 1.1 /100 | #233 | Tragic 18.6% |
Fijians | 1.1 /100 | #234 | Tragic 18.6% |